Links and Chains

March 4, 2010
By Yonah

Leig nisht dein hant in tash,” my father tells my son. It’s like my own childhood all over again. Hands in pockets were always considered wrong. It was never explained.

It’s Friday night and the three of us walk home from shul together. Others too are taking advantage of the warm weather despite the piles of blackened snow around us. Fathers and sons stroll casually, some of them engrossed in deep conversation, others just walking quietly. Groups of girls play noisily, most of them dressed in almost identical black shabbos robes. Every once in a while a newly married couple passes us, he in a brand new shtreimel, she in a fur trimmed coat. There are few cars on the street and the usually busy neighborhood is enveloped in unusual serenity.

“Farvoos, zaidy?” my son asks as we pass by a Hatzoloh SUV illegally blocking a driveway. Hints of orange gear can be seen through the heavily tinted windows. In shabbos mode, in case of an emergency.

We pass a group of people standing on the corner, lingering over the last bits of gossip. One of them looks familiar and we politely nod, “Git Shabbos.

Shema Israel - Israel Museum Collection

“Veil azoy geit a goy,” my father says, lovingly stroking his einikel’s cheek. My son was the first to be named after his great-grandfather, and although my father loves all his einiklech, everyone knows my son is his favorite. My son, in turn, adores his zaidy.

I watch the two of them walking together. Hand in hand. My young son, face scrubbed clean for Shabbos, eyes shining as he makes a mental note to keep his hands out of his pockets. That’s the way he is, carefully respecting authority and eagerly accepting new teachings. His personality is already clearly defined. So like me when I was his age.

I don’t question my father for a source, or get into a debate on the merits of this custom, rooted as it is in our desperate desire to be different from those around us. I don’t make him look bad in front of my son. It would be pointless. Besides, why ruin the moment?

We are part of a beautiful chain. Father to son. Some call it links. Others call it shackles. Same difference.

Printable Version Printable Version

Share |

Tags: , , ,

Line Break

Author: Yonah (3 Articles)

33 Responses to “ Links and Chains ”

  1. Insider on March 4, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    Ah, Yonah, your father didnt reveal the real reason behind it. Should I? Ok, here it is, you might wake up the snake and make him crawl out of his cage..

    RC, are you entertained?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  2. Berish on March 4, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    My friend’s mother would stitch together his pants pockets.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  3. Rupture & Continuity on March 4, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    I would be very entertained were not my pockets repeatedley inspected for holes by my teachers when I was young.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  4. Rupture & Continuity on March 4, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    Yonah, nicely done.

    Ahhh, the friday night stroll home from shul, fathers and sons holding hands, its one of those precious moments that keeps it all together.

    Highly rated. Like this comment? Thumb up 5

  5. Yoelish on March 4, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    Why not? Simple. You shouldn’t be a נוגע בדבר!

    Like this comment? Thumb up 3

  6. chnyock on March 4, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    mzol nisht cholila poigem zain in kdishas hayesoid!!!!!

    what’s that?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  7. Hoezen T on March 4, 2010 at 6:50 pm

    Oiy chevrah, I think frummer might be right. Too much sex talk on this blog lately. I feel the way I feel after eating too much chocolate.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  8. mendy chossid on March 4, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    Hoezen T – chocolate is supposed to be healthy for the heart according to the latest research ! Let’s not live in denial – that never solved any problem !

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  9. Frummer on March 4, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    HT:

    Indeed. But, digging back into the dusty memories of my blogging days, I seem to remember that sex sells!

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  10. Anony Mouse on March 4, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    I don’t think this story is about sex.

    But I guess everyone can find what they want in it.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  11. Hoezen T on March 4, 2010 at 10:42 pm

    So Ms. Mousy, are you suggesting that I am like the patient who was being administer a Rorschach as per a psychological evaluation?

    This particular guy got really pissed at his psychologist. He called him a pervert and a pig because all this doctor was showing him were ink blots that were very pornographic in nature.

    Posters of Unpious, is it you, or is it us readers?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  12. Hasidic Rebel on March 4, 2010 at 10:54 pm

    Hmmm… And here I thought we’ve moved on from the sex post. Is it me, or do some people just like to talk about sex — even if it means complaining about having too much of it?

    Highly rated. Like this comment? Thumb up 4

  13. Insider on March 4, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    HR and HT
    It’s not about the sex, these are the actual reasons why yiddish kinder don’t put their hands in their pockets. The comments pertain to the topic and it’s something Yonahs father was painfuly misinformed with, therefore it was our duty to educate him.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  14. F.G. on March 5, 2010 at 5:16 am

    Goyishe Parents also tell their children not to put their hands in the pockets…

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  15. Frummer on March 5, 2010 at 5:43 am

    Rebbele,

    Hmmmmmm. Please don’t tell me you don’t understand the euphemism of Veil azoy geit a goy.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  16. Shlomo Schwartz on March 5, 2010 at 7:13 am

    Frummer, I don’t understand the euphemism and I would venture to guess that neither did Yonah’s father when he said it.

    Oh and Insider, that’s a ridiculous reason if I ever heard one.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  17. Frummer on March 5, 2010 at 7:27 am

    Shlomo

    Don’t believe it if u dont want to, but that really is the reason. It really is all about the sex thing.

    Yonahs father knew very well. But one just doesn’t say “Nice Yiddishe Kindalach don’t shoot pool”. :-)

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  18. Shlomo Schwartz on March 5, 2010 at 7:32 am

    Are you explaining a euphemism with another euphemism??? “Veil azoy geit a goy” was used in my childhood as an excuse for many “you can’ts” not just the hen tin the hoizen. I for one would like to understand once and for all what that means.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  19. Skeleton on March 5, 2010 at 9:40 am

    Goyishe Parents also tell their children not to put their hands in the pockets…

    No, you heard incorrectly. They were probably telling their kids not to put their hands into others’ pockets.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 2

  20. Rupture & Continuity on March 5, 2010 at 10:45 am

    S.S.

    “Veil azoy geit a goy” was used in my childhood as an excuse for many “you can’ts”

    You just answered your own question. The euphemism is an excuse. The real reason for the “pocketed hands aversion” is what Insider mentioned.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  21. Jolly Joe on March 5, 2010 at 10:52 am

    Well I was told “Yad Lauma Tikztotz” A hand that Ventures down to your Private parts Shall be Cut. Self Understood that my hand was never found in a pocket.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  22. ungizetzt on March 5, 2010 at 11:07 am

    the biggest problem, with all this stupid minhag yisroel torahs, is. it leaves comfusion, which in turn leads in to insecurity, and the result is to scared to question if all this garbage makes sense.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  23. Rupture & Continuity on March 5, 2010 at 11:22 am

    Jolly Joe, how then do you explain the 2 stubs protruding from your side?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  24. Yoelish on March 5, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    When I was around 11-years-old, the teacher, through the microphone in the lunchroom, asked me to remove my hands from my pockets. When I asked “why?,” he replied, “because that’s what Esau did.” I argued that it doesn’t necessarily make it a bad thing; Esau also championed kibud ov hueim.

    The man’s facial reaction told me that had he been my teacher, he would’ve slapped me in the face with his thin, long fingers.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 3

  25. osvorf on March 5, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Years ago when i was still a believer in religion, i went to the sklene rebbe for a bruche – blessing. There was this tall litvish modern guy there at the time begging the rebbe to wish him to have parnuse, (a good solid income) as he was asking from the rebbe for the bruche he had his hands in his pocket. The rebbe looked at him, and told him. If you keep your hands in your pocket then it makes you poor… of course the guy took it out immedietly and said, but rebbe, please give me a bruche and the rebbe told him again about not keeping the hand in the pocket bs. I remember that look on the face from that guy, prety frustrated, i felt relly bad for him. I think in the end he got a bruche or something. Its funny how they believe that holding your hand in your pocket is so bad. On the other hand they say, if you put the wine from sat night in your piocket that helps to have a better income… i guess you have to put the wine in really fast so its not considered holding your hands in your pocket, or it will screw up your income even after adding the wine in the pocket… go figure…

    Highly rated. Like this comment? Thumb up 5

  26. froylein on March 6, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    The reason why secular parents tell their kids not to put their hands into their pockets is because your hands are there to protect your face if you trip and fall (it’s a natural reflex). Also, you naturally walk more “firmly” and safely if you swing your arms X-wise, i.e. when you put your right foot forward, your left arm should move forward, too.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 3

  27. prude on March 7, 2010 at 10:52 am

    All this talk about masturbation, you guys forgot about the main point:
    We are part of a beautiful chain. Father to son. Some call it links. Others call it shackles. Same difference.

    But yeah, I agree, there is too much sex on this site, even though the sex always has some non-sexual point.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  28. froylein on March 7, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    Prude, there’s a rule-of-thumb: those that talk about sex the most get the least action…

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  29. kafhakela on March 7, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    Prude:
    As per Freud, all the important non-sexual points boil down to sexual points in the end. Or is it the other way around?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  30. cupid chussid on March 7, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    Is the issur of whistling also ‘cus goyim do that, or the similar but lesser, s’nish balbatish? Lubavtchers of course have a totally different take on both the balbatish as well as the goyim issues. Hence their theology of whistling is a separate story, based on the pan-Chassidic dictum of “as the Rebbe does, so too shall all Chassidim do”. I was once told by frum know-it-al that the Zohar, somewhere or other, proscribes it. Though I’m quite conversant in the literature of Jewish mysticism, yet I went the extra bytes searching the digital version of the Zoharic texts; The Zohar, Zohar Corrections, New Zohar, New Zohar Corrections etc., to no avail. Still, while on the streets of BP I catch myself biting my tongue after whistling a few notes regardless of genre, be they; Classical, Klezmer, Country, Yomtov Erlich, Lennon or Shloimele…
    A lesser known issur is interlocked fingers. Though in this case the aversion may be due to its similarity to the stance certain Christians maintain during prayer, yet, when I asked for a source I was referred to an unspecified page in an unspecified book of kabbalah. It seems to be another default (i)rationale frequently given.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  31. Yank on March 8, 2010 at 10:53 am

    Real Yoilishes dont spell “Esau”.

    They would type Eisov or something like that.

    Real Yoilishes wouldn’t champion anything.

    Maybe u should choose a better handle……….

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

  32. Yoelish on March 8, 2010 at 11:18 am

    Yank, why yank my true self?

    Like this comment? Thumb up 1

  33. Yonah on March 8, 2010 at 10:26 pm

    Surprisingly, only a select few read the article beyond the first half.

    Like this comment? Thumb up 0

Like this site?

Find us on…

 

Recent Comments

  • Jon: Well, my own experience has been different, and most of the OTD’s I’ve met are party-line liberals...
  • azur@israel: as i remeber family of Twerski had a lot of miracles during their story. for example miracle of two...
  • Hasidic Rebel: Jon, you state the premise as if it’s a given and then go on to explain why it’s so. While...
  • Jon: HR – while both Shloimy and Abe didn’t exactly present their point well (at all,) they are right...
  • shloimy: I’m thumbing my response so ill be short for now. I’m starting to appreciate your responses. I...
  • Hasidic Rebel: TL — That’s an interesting point you make. Didn’t think of it. In truth, when I...
  • Hasidic Rebel: Shloimy — “It seems that you you equate all off yidishkiet from the prism of the enclave...
  • Twerski Letter: In the quoted Twerski letter he draws a parallel between his future father-in-law and Stalin, though...
  • shloimy 3: What I dislike about this site is the verbal attacks. when someones questions your believe, instead of...
  • shloimy 2: Is it honorable that when marrying as a religous person to another believer, that when one spouse decides...

Facebook Recommends…